André Miguel

Every PM you've talked to would need months to understand what you're building.

You've seen what happens when the product person doesn't get the technical depth. Wrong priorities. Promises the system can't keep. Months wasted on ramp-up. This is the opposite — product thinking that speaks the math, not around it. Actual decisions from week one.

If you became a CTO to build great systems, instead you're the bottleneck
Choosing between product decisions going unmade and making them yourself, at the cost of the work you actually care about. That weight comes off your plate. No hand-holding. No ramp-up.

If your model works but your product decisions don't
That's a product problem, not an engineering problem. But it needs someone who speaks the engineering. Not "ship and pray" advice that treats your system like a deterministic SaaS app.

I have experience in product across simulation systems, AI/ML modeling, and enterprise platforms. Heavy background in mathematics and engineering. Available for hands-on fractional and advisory product work.

If any of this sounds familiar, let's have a conversation.